Efektivitas Penerapan Core Tax System dalam Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (Studi Kasus pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Jakarta) Tahun 2025)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digital transformation in the tax administration system is a strategic agenda of the Indonesian government to improve the effectiveness of tax management and taxpayer compliance. One of the main innovations is the implementation of the Core Tax System as an integrated system that manages the entire tax administration cycle digitally and in real-time (OECD, 2022). This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of the Core Tax System in increasing taxpayer compliance at the Pratama Jakarta Tax Service Office (KPP) in 2025. The research uses a quantitative method with a survey approach. The research sample amounted to 120 taxpayers who were selected through simple random sampling techniques. Data was collected through a Likert scale-based questionnaire and analyzed using simple linear regression with the help of SPSS. The results of the study show that the implementation of the Core Tax System has a positive and significant effect on taxpayer compliance with a significance value of < 0.05 and a determination coefficient of 62%. These findings confirm that the digitalization of the tax system contributes significantly to increasing the formal and material compliance of taxpayers (Alm, 2019; Bird & Zolt, 2018).
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alm, J. (2019). What motivates tax compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353–388. Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2018).
Technology and taxation in developing countries. National Tax Journal, 71(1), 1–26. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2024). Transformasi digital administrasi perpajakan Indonesia. Jakarta: DJP. Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2007).
Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract. Law & Policy, 29(1), 102–120. Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2015).
Tax authorities’ interaction with taxpayers. New Ideas in Psychology, 37, 13–23. Hair, J. F., et al. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.).
Cengage Learning. James, S., & Alley, C. (2020).
Tax compliance and tax administration. Journal of Finance and Management, 5(2), 27–42. Kirchler, E. (2007).
The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press. Mardiasmo. (2021). Perpajakan. Yogyakarta: Andi. OECD. (2020).
Tax administration 2020. OECD Publishing. OECD. (2022).
Tax administration 2022. OECD Publishing. Palil, M. R., & Mustapha, A. F. (2011).
Factors affecting tax compliance behaviour. African Journal of Business Management, 5(33), 12864–12872. Putri, W. A., & Setiawan, P. E. (2017).
Sistem administrasi perpajakan modern. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 18(2), 1254–1281. Rahayu, S. K. (2020).
Perpajakan Indonesia. Graha Ilmu. Saad, N. (2014).
Tax knowledge and tax compliance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1069–1075. Susanto, A., & Meiryani. (2019).
Information system quality and tax compliance. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 20(2), 89–103. Venkatesh, V., et al. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 157–178.