The review process at JETCOM is conducted using a double-blind peer review system, meaning both author and reviewer identities are kept anonymous throughout the evaluation to ensure objectivity.

1. Review Stages

1. Initial Editorial Screening

• The editor evaluates the relevance and alignment of the manuscript with the journal’s Focus and Scope.

• Manuscripts that do not meet the criteria or show more than 20% plagiarism will be rejected immediately.

2. Reviewer Assignment

• Manuscripts that pass the initial check are sent to two independent reviewers.

• Reviewers are selected based on expertise in relevant fields.

3. Evaluation Process

• Reviewers assess the manuscript for originality, methodology, clarity, topic relevance, and scientific contribution.

• Each reviewer provides one of the following recommendations:

  • Accepted without revision

  • Accepted with minor revision

  • Major revision required

  • Rejected

4. Final Editorial Decision

• Based on reviewer feedback, the editor makes a final decision and sends the evaluation results to the author.

• Authors are given a maximum of 14 days to submit their revisions.

5. Final Check & Proofreading

• Once revisions are approved, the editor performs a final check of formatting, language quality, and reference style.

6. Online Publication

• Articles that pass all stages will be published online in the scheduled issue and assigned a DOI (Digital Object Identifier).